Posts about ipad

Reading On the iPad

First up, iBooks didn't work for me. Most of the books on my reading list were not available there. However, most of them were available on Kindle, and you can read any Kindle book on the iPad by downloading the free Kindle app. Does Amazon care that you are not reading them on a Kindle? No at all, since you are still paying for every book that you read.

So I tried reading a Kindle book: Emotional Design by Donald A. Norman. What I found is that reading on the iPad is the best reading experience there has ever been: far better than physical books of any form factor. Molly Wood did not do it any justice.

Why I Disagree With Molly

Molly's main complaint was that the iPad is too heavy to hold like a book - with two hands holding in front of your face. 

Holding Up-Right

My answer to this is simple: don't hold it like that! What I have found to work best for me is to set the display at a larger font size, so you don't have to hold the device close to your face in order to read it comfortably. I usually put the iPad on my lap flat:

Lap Flat

or slightly till it toward me by crossing my legs:

Crossed Legs

or propping up my legs:

Crouched Legs

This works so nice because one of the nicest features of the iPad is it's cool operational temperature - I would never do this with my Macbook Air. If I feel real lazy, sometimes I lie all the way down on my side and hold it up side ways with one hand.

Lying Down

Why it's Better Than a Book

The reading experience of the iPad is decidedly better than a real book. With a book, well, you usually have to hold it up with two hands, which puts strain on your arms and your palm. If you decide to hold it with one hand, you will contort your fingers in a strange way to try to hold the pages down which will strain your palm even more, to turn a page you'd most likely still require two hands. If you hold the iPad the way I prescribed, you are not really holding it with your hands at all, so no strain, but even better than that, turning a page is a matter of a tap or a flick of a thumb! In fact, when you are sitting comfortably reading with an iPad, the only thing you'll ever have to move is one finger.

Another advantage that the iPad - and eReaders in general - have over books that is rarely mentioned is their accessibility for the visually impaired. In short: old people don't read so good. My mom returned a paperback book because the print was too small for her to read. With an eReader you can set the font size to what's the most comfortable for you.

It's All eBooks From Here

That's it. I've decided. I will never buy a book again unless I absolutely have to.
Posted by Toby 2 months ago about eReaders, gadgets, ipad and tech (0 comments)

My Thoughts on the iPad

iPad
I've followed engadget's live blog, seen the keynote video, listened to Tom and Molly talk about it, even read others' opinions on engadgetgdgt and twitter, etc etc. I guess you could say I am pretty excited. 

The tech savy(engadget, gdgt, BOL, etc) are in general underwhelmed or disappointed. Below are some of the complaints I have heard:
  • No Webcam or microphone - which pretty much rules out using Skype on it, which would have been a great killer app at this form factor. I think they will add these to the iPad in the future. Update: actually, there IS a built-in microphone, so at least you can make audio calls with Skype.
  • Still No Flash Support - you cannot seriously claim it has the best web browsing experience when it doesn't support Flash! Apple has not allowed Flash to run on the iPhone all this time. Now that they are doing the  same with the iPad - which with it's larger screen you would think would be much better suited to run Flash apps, and add to it the fact that Flash has never ran great on Macs, it's becoming obvious that this is political. Apple wants to fight a format war with Adobe. Why would you need flash when you can buy great apps from the app store and buy TV shows and movies from iTunes? On the other hand, I can also see the concern that almost all of the flash apps out there(possibly with the exception of Flash ads) just aren't designed for the touch screen, and having users run them on the iPhone or the iPad degrades the user experience and therefore could hurt the products' reputation. Apple's PR, however, is going with: "it could rapidly drain battery life", which I think is probably in reality 3rd or 4th down on their list of concerns.
  • No multiple tasks/apps/windows - this is a pretty big one: given the iPad's screen real estate, it seems artificially limiting to not allow multiple apps to be running in separate windows. I believe the iPad will eventually have this feature. How the UI will turn out will be interesting to see. 
  • The App Store Sucks - Apple prevents certain types of applications from entering its App Store. One example is programming language interpreters; another is any app that Apple views as overstepping their core apps' boundaries. Given that the iPad is even more of a computer than the iPhone, these limitations may become even more glaring.
  • I just don't see the need - "I already have a laptop and a smartphone, there just isn't any more room for yet another device!" I think that at the moment the iPad is more exciting for developers than consumers, but that will change.

All the negatives are well and good, but I overlook all of them, because, from my point of view, the iPad - and what it will lead to - is much bigger. All of the tablet computers I've seen in stores in the past - HP's, Fujitsu's, etc: they all suck. These computer manufacturers created tablet computers but installed on them an Operating System which is design from the ground up for use with a mouse and a keyboard. They figured: "A tablet computer has a stylus. We can use it as a pointing device in the same way that a mouse is a pointing device. We just hook up the stylus driver to control the pointer, and boom! We got ourselves a tablet Operating System! Brilliant!" This is understandable, because it is the nature of software engineers to want to build solutions that solve as many problems as possible - and Windows is a very very big solution indeed. However, this tendency also causes brilliant people to routinely produce crap. The tablet form factor is more versatile than the mouse, and can be much more natural to use from a UI standpoint, but dumbing it down and retrofitting it to an inferior UI paradigm caused it to be marginal. Yes, you could use a tablet to draw, sign documents, take notes, etc, but when it came to interacting with the UI elements, it was usually very kludgy. 

iPad is the first tablet I've seen that comes close to realizing the potential of the tablet form factor. Why? It's all about the software, stupid! The software that come with the iPad were designed and written  specifically for the large multi-touch screen device. This is to take nothing away from the amazing hardware. Multi-touch was ground breaking when it first surfaced. When the iPad comes to market, it will be the single best showcase of multi-touch technology. But, the software is what brings it all together, and you can tell Apple put a lot of time and effort into the software. Okay, enough of my rambling. What am I really trying to say? 

iPad marks a historical step towards our liberation from mouse pointers and a paradigm shift in computer technology.

I hereby reiterate my prediction that in 5 to 10 years, mice will be on the way to extinction.
Posted by Toby 7 months ago about apple, fourcast, gadgets, ipad, tablet and tech (0 comments)